www.google.com

lynx www.google.com

www.aws.org

do you think www.aws.org runs on aws?

www.allure.com/story/best-sex-tip-by-zodiac-sign/amp?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a6&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=16392879347932&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.allure.com%2Fstory%2Fbest-sex-tip-by-zodiac-sign

For those inter st in the finest writing of all time https://www-allure-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.allure.com/story/best-sex-tip-by-zodiac-sign/amp?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a6&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=16392879347932&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.allure.com%2Fstory%2Fbest-sex-tip-by-zodiac-sign

You Can’t Sacrifice Partition Tolerance | codahale.com

<![endif] Coda Hale { writing , projects , about , contact } You Can’t Sacrifice Partition Tolerance 07 Oct 2010 I’ve seen a number of distributed databases recently describe themselves as being “CA” –that is, providing both consistency and availability while not providing partition-tolerance. To me, this indicates that the developers of these systems do not understand the CAP theorem and its implications. In 2000, Dr. Eric Brewer gave a keynote at the Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing 1 in which he laid out his famous CAP Theorem: a shared-data system can have at most two of the three following properties: C onsistency, A vailability, and tolerance to network P artitions. In 2002, Gilbert and Lynch 2 converted “Brewer’s conjecture” into a more formal definition with an informal proof. As far as I can tell, it’s been misundersto...

Linked on 2015-02-24 23:30:10 | Similar Links