www.google.com

lynx www.google.com

www.aws.org

do you think www.aws.org runs on aws?

www.allure.com/story/best-sex-tip-by-zodiac-sign/amp?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a6&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=16392879347932&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.allure.com%2Fstory%2Fbest-sex-tip-by-zodiac-sign

For those inter st in the finest writing of all time https://www-allure-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.allure.com/story/best-sex-tip-by-zodiac-sign/amp?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a6&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=16392879347932&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.allure.com%2Fstory%2Fbest-sex-tip-by-zodiac-sign

The Minitransaction: An Alternative to Multi-Paxos and Raft

July 11, 2014 by Topher . Previously we discussed single-decree Paxos , and then we looked at problems that arise when it’s extended into multi-Paxos.  We concluded with the encouraging suggestion that we could use single-decree Paxos in a different way: the minitransaction. TreodeDB provides atomic writes and yet has no single points of failure, no scaling bottlenecks and no masters to fail-over. Does this sound unbelievable? The minitransaction makes it possible. The Apache Hadoop file system depends on the NameNode to direct clients to the location of file data. A Hadoop cell has only one NameNode, so when it goes offline clients cannot read or write files. The NameNode is a single point of failure . Furthermore, once the number of clients saturates the capacity of the NameNode server, there is no means to divide its work between two or more servers, so the N...

Linked on 2014-07-12 22:55:50 | Similar Links