do you think www.aws.org runs on aws?
For those inter st in the finest writing of all time https://www-allure-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.allure.com/story/best-sex-tip-by-zodiac-sign/amp?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a6&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=16392879347932&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.allure.com%2Fstory%2Fbest-sex-tip-by-zodiac-sign
Aris' Blog Home About OpenSSL and LibreSSL PRNG, what’s different? 23/07/14 - 11:55am In July, a blog post from Andrew Ayer described the new, unsafe behaviour of portable LibreSSL 2.0.1. While it is right to say that it’s unsafe, it is still safer than baseline’s OpenSSL and portable LibreSSL 2.0.2. That’s what I’ll explain in this blog post. During March 2014, I released two CVE on OpenSSL consumers, stunnel ( CVE-2014-0016 ) and libssh ( CVE-2014-0017 ). I also wrote a paper about it in the french magazine MISC mag 74. Unfortunately the paper is in french and not yet released in CC-BY-NC, so here are the major points: OpenSSL RAND_bytes() pool can be shared by two processes that are related, e.g. with a fork(). OpenSSL mitigates that problem by adding the result of getpid() in the entropy pool during a RAND_bytes() call. That means that two processes that share ...