www.google.com

lynx www.google.com

www.aws.org

do you think www.aws.org runs on aws?

www.allure.com/story/best-sex-tip-by-zodiac-sign/amp?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a6&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=16392879347932&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.allure.com%2Fstory%2Fbest-sex-tip-by-zodiac-sign

For those inter st in the finest writing of all time https://www-allure-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.allure.com/story/best-sex-tip-by-zodiac-sign/amp?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a6&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=16392879347932&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.allure.com%2Fstory%2Fbest-sex-tip-by-zodiac-sign

ImperialViolet - BoringSSL

ImperialViolet BoringSSL We recently switched Google's two billion line repository over to BoringSSL , our fork of OpenSSL . This means that BoringSSL is now powering Chromium (on nearly all platforms), Android M and Google's production services. For the first time, the majority of Google's products are sharing a single TLS stack and making changes no longer involves several days of work juggling patch files across multiple repositories. This is a big positive for Google and I'm going to document some of the changes that we've made in BoringSSL in this post. I am not saying that people should be ditching OpenSSL and switching to BoringSSL. For Linux distributions that doesn't even make sense because we've removed too much for many applications to run unaltered and, without linker trickery, it's not possible to have both OpenSSL and BoringSSL in the same process because their ...

Linked on 2015-10-21 19:31:25 | Similar Links